On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Dan Phoenix wrote: > On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > > Yep, that's 4 million unique emails. Actually, I should qualify that, it > > took 4 hours for the mail servers to accept and queue them. The outgoing > > probably took a bit longer, but from the way the queues stacked up, it > > probably wasn't more than 5 hours to get all the deliverable messages out > > (except for excite.com which wasn't taking mail at the time). > > when you say "about 30 mailers" are you talking about 30 separate > machines? Yes, 30 machines that live to deliver. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: APACHE PROBLEMS Mike Silbersack
- Re: APACHE PROBLEMS Mike Silbersack
- Re: APACHE PROBLEMS Dan Phoenix
- Re: test Eric Melville
- Re: test Dan Phoenix
- qmail IO--qmail vs postfix competition Dan Phoenix
- Re: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix competition Gordon Tetlow
- Re: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix competition Jesper Skriver
- Re: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix competition Gordon Tetlow
- Re: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix competitio... Dan Phoenix
- Re: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix compe... Gordon Tetlow
- Re: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix compe... Dan Phoenix
- Re: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix compe... Gordon Tetlow
- Re: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix compe... Gordon Tetlow
- Re: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix compe... scanner
- Re: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix compe... Gordon Tetlow
- Re: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix compe... scanner
- Re: qmail IO--qmail vs postfix compe... Peter Wemm
- apache Dan Phoenix
- Re: apache Dan Phoenix
- Re: apache Matt Dillon