Matt Dillon wrote: > Yes. In general softupdates will make the entire filesystem safer. Does it make sense to use softupdates on file systems like / and /usr which have little file creation/removal? Greg To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: vinum and (now) postfix Thomas Strömberg
- Re: vinum and (now) postfix Chris Faulhaber
- Re: vinum and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Greg Lehey
- Re: vinum and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Greg Lehey
- Re: vinum and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Michael C . Wu
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Alfred Perlstein
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Andre Oppermann
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Greg Black
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Aleksandr A.Babaylov
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Matt Dillon
- soft updates performance Greg Black
- Re: soft updates performance Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates performance Alfred Perlstein
- Re: soft updates performance Greg Black
- Re: soft updates performance Kent Stewart
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Tony Finch
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Greg Black