: :Don't forget to put logging and other such things on a separate drive.. :even a small 1G drive as a secondary will be ok, as long as it has soft :updates and doesn't share heads with the work area.. : :vmstat 1 and iostat 1 output would be intersting. : :-- : __--_|\ Julian Elischer That's probably a little overkill. Since the log files are not being fsync()'d, they won't generally interfere with other operations. The real killer here is the fsync()ing that the mail system is doing on every file, but that's the price you pay for reliable crash recovery. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Kernel editing tools. Kevin Brunelle
- Re: vinum and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Greg Lehey
- Re: vinum and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Matt Dillon
- Re: vinum and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Julian Elischer
- Re: vinum and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Julian Elischer
- Re: vinum and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Dan Phoenix
- Re: vinum and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Geoff Buckingham
- Re: vinum and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Dan Phoenix
- Re: vinum and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Matt Dillon
- Re: vinum and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Julian Elischer
- Re: vinum and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Matt Dillon
- Re: vinum and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Anton Berezin
- Re: vinum and (now) postfix Thomas Strömberg
- Re: vinum and (now) postfix Chris Faulhaber
- Re: vinum and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Greg Lehey
- Re: vinum and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Greg Lehey
- Re: vinum and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Michael C . Wu
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Alfred Perlstein
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Matt Dillon
- Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Andre Oppermann