At 09:37 29/01/01 -0800, Matt Dillon wrote: > This is a bad idea. One of the reasons why it is so easy for us to > write portability modules for Sun, Linux, etc... is because of the > hard-coded syscall numbers. Syscalls work plenty well enough as they > are now, we do not need a new mechansm. true, but if the same idea gets adopted by those many OSes, then it's a benefit for them all. just how PAM came: it was non-portabble before adoption! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: [kernel patch] fcntl(...) to close many descriptors Jacques A. Vidrine
- Re: [kernel patch] fcntl(...) to close many descriptors Matt Dillon
- Re: [kernel patch] fcntl(...) to close many descri... Garance A Drosihn
- Re: [kernel patch] fcntl(...) to close many de... mouss
- Re: [kernel patch] fcntl(...) to close man... Jacques A. Vidrine
- Re: [kernel patch] fcntl(...) to close man... Daniel Eischen
- Re: [kernel patch] fcntl(...) to close man... Matt Dillon
- Re: [kernel patch] fcntl(...) to close man... mouss
- Re: [kernel patch] fcntl(...) to close man... Matt Dillon
- Re: [kernel patch] fcntl(...) to close man... Luigi Rizzo
- Re: [kernel patch] fcntl(...) to close man... Garrett Wollman
- Re: [kernel patch] fcntl(...) to close man... Luigi Rizzo
- Re: [kernel patch] fcntl(...) to close man... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [kernel patch] fcntl(...) to close man... Luigi Rizzo
- Re: [kernel patch] fcntl(...) to close man... Garrett Wollman
- Re: [kernel patch] fcntl(...) to close man... Luigi Rizzo
- Re: [kernel patch] fcntl(...) to close man... Garrett Wollman
- Re: [kernel patch] fcntl(...) to close man... Bakul Shah

