On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 03:15:43PM -0500, Trent Nelson wrote:
>
> I'd just like to confirm that my interpretation of how kevent()
> can be made to handle signals is correct.
>
> From kqueue(2):
>
> ...
>
> EVFILT_SIGNAL
> Takes the signal number to monitor as the identifier and returns when
> the given signal is delivered to the process. This coexists with the
> signal() and sigaction() facilities, and has a lower precedence. The
> filter will record all attempts to deliver a signal to a process, even
> if the signal has been marked as SIG_IGN. [...]
>
> So if I set all appropriate signals I want to monitor to SIG_IGN, I
> can essentially have kevent() becoming the primary signal handling
> mechanism in my program?
Correct.
--
Jonathan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
