SteveB wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Drew Eckhardt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 12:15 PM
> > To: SteveB
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Sitting on hands (no longer Re: FreeBSD vs
> > Linux, Solaris,
> > and NT)
> >
> >
> > In message
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, admin@bsdfan
> > .cncdsl.com writes:
> >
> > >QA is unglamorous work, but needs to be done.
> >
> > Does this mean you're volunteering?
> >
> >
> I don't have a lot of time, but I would volunteer if there was a QA
> project. I think it would be a good learning experience.
One of the things I have been doing it cycling through 4 systems
upgrading the userland and kernel. I have a script setup such that I
capture everything from the cvsup log to build and installs. During
the transition between 4.1.1-stable and 4.2-stable, one of this
systems was updated everyday. It isn't a QA cycle that I experienced
in the commercial world associated with the US Nuclear Regulatory
Commission but it did insure that my setups work. If someone popps up
on -stable and says that the "Buildworld is failing" for 4-stable, it
is really easy to fire off that script and find out if it is. I have
one running at this time.
Kent
>
> Steve B.
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
--
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html
FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
