"Michael C . Wu" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 04:14:10PM -0800, Devin Butterfield scribbled:
> | "Michael C . Wu" wrote:
> | > The most important decision now would be:
> | > Should we concentrate on the PPC port first? Or should we go at each
> | > port simultaneously?
> |
> | Well, if there are enough people with PCC's that are interested in
> | helping with the effort then perhaps pursuing the PPC port first would
> | make more sense. I don't have a PPC so I couldn't help out there...
> |
> | If the decision is to pursue a StrongARM port then you can count me in.
>
> I'm definitely interested in both StrongARM and PPC. (and so are very
> many people) My understanding is that FreeBSD *wants* a FreeBSD/ARM,
> but lack the resources/man-power to do so. I'd prefer to see an
> official decision on the above by someone (hint hint -core :)) though.
It's mainly a matter of interest (interested, dedicated people) rather
than an official decision. I would say "go for it", and if it comes
about, then great. If not, oh, well.
Patrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
