On 18 Dec 2000, at 12:11, Joseph Scott wrote:

> 
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Dan Langille wrote:
> 
> # On 18 Dec 2000, at 12:03, Joseph Scott wrote:
> # 
> # >   Let's say, at a minimum you want the queue to run every 30
> # > minutes.  However, if there are a large number of commits in the queue,
> # > you may want to be able ramp up to queue processing as quickly as every 5
> # > minutes.  If there's only two items in the queue though, there's really no
> # > reason to run it every 5 minutes.
> # 
> # I would rather process the queue as soon as a new message arrives.  
> # Rather than have a message sit there.  Hence, the "notification" of a 
> # waiting process: OI!  you got mail....
> 
>       Then my original answer should have simply been, find a box that
> will host FreshPorts that can take the load of processing 5000 commit
> mails in a minute.  :-)

Good idea!

Sorry, but after reading my own message, I've seen it's ambiguous.

In my previous message, by "process the queue as soon as a new 
message arrives", I was referring to the procmail scenario mentioned in 
a prior message.  That is, have procmail deliever each email to a 
separate file, and process *that* file into FreshPorts as soon as it 
arrives.  In that context, the "queue" is the files on disk.  With this 
strategy, I'm sure a P100 could handle things.

--
Dan Langille
The FreeBSD Diary - http://www.freebsddiary.org/
          NZ ADSL - http://www.unixathome.org/adsl/
     NZ Broadband - http://www.unixathome.org/broadband/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to