In the last episode (Dec 16), Axel Thimm said: > Wouldn't that mean, that you might cause data corruption if, say, I > was to read my mail from a FreeBSD box over an NFS mounted spool > directory (running under OSF1 in our case), and I decided to write > back the mbox to the spool dir the same moment new mail is delivered? That's why dotlocking is recommended for locking mail spools. Both procmail and mutt will dotlock your mail file while it's being accessed. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: rpc.lockd and true NFS locks? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: rpc.lockd and true NFS locks? Thierry Herbelot
- Re: rpc.lockd and true NFS locks? Garrett Rooney
- Re: rpc.lockd and true NFS locks? David E. Cross
- Re: rpc.lockd and true NFS locks? Matt Dillon
- Re: rpc.lockd and true NFS locks? David E. Cross
- Re: rpc.lockd and true NFS locks? Jordan Hubbard
- Re: rpc.lockd and true NFS locks? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: rpc.lockd and true NFS locks? David E. Cross
- Re: rpc.lockd and true NFS locks? Axel Thimm
- Re: rpc.lockd and true NFS locks? Dan Nelson
- Re: rpc.lockd and true NFS locks? Jos Backus
- Re: rpc.lockd and true NFS locks? Axel Thimm
- Re: rpc.lockd and true NFS locks? Don Coleman
- Re: rpc.lockd and true NFS locks? Doug Barton