On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Tim Tsai wrote:

> 
> Also, my requirements are significantly more relaxed than a true DSM model
> (and much more lightweight is preferred)..  I really just need synchronized
> views of data on a "reasonable" effort basis (i.e.  it's OK if one
> client/peer sees slightly older data.  Sequence is important though).

check out http://www.acl.lanl.gov/~rminnich, see zounds. 

Worked well for me on clusters. The only DSM I've ever seen that supports
IP multicast for updates.

ron



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to