On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> wrote: > I guess I'm late to the party (catching up on the whole thread took a > while...) > > > On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Eitan Adler wrote: > >> patch(1) explicitly tries to use RCS (and SCCS) in certain cases. Are >> we okay with a base system utility that behaves differently depending >> on whether a port is installed? Should the relevant code be removed >> from patch(1)? >> >> See head/usr.bin/patch/inp.c lines 166 to 240 for details. > > > It seems like maybe this question should have been answered before rcs was > removed, instead of after? > (I don't know whether I would have expected you to be able to find every use > of rcs, everywhere, prior to removing it, but this is what public > declaration of intent/discussions help with.)
I was asked by members of core@ to expedite the removal to 10.X - it was not done just because I felt like it. In any case its been reverted now so the discussion is moot. -- Eitan Adler _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
