-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 07/10/13 10:38, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: [snip] > I'm sure lots of folks have "some solution" to this. Here is an > old version of what we use at Spectra: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~gibbs/zfs_patches/zfs_auto_ashift.diff > > The above patch is missing some cleanup that was motivated by my > discussions with George Wilson about this change in April. I'll > dig that up later tonight. Even if you don't read the full diff, > please read the included checkin comment since it explains the > motivation behind this particular solution. > > This is on my list of things to upstream in the next week or so > after I add logic to the userspace tools to report whether or not > the TLVs in a pool are using an optimal allocation size. This is > only possible if you actually make ZFS fully aware of logical, > physical, and the configured allocation size. All of the other > patches I've seen just treat physical as logical.
Yes, me too. Your version is superior. Cheers, - -- Xin LI <delp...@delphij.net> https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJR3aQzAAoJEG80Jeu8UPuzHn8H/1ZpoTqAQ4+mgQOttOwXgBcr 2Fgh52ztW8fCEQSeIosxXKO06hP7HxFfTPvmeeWyjT8zIpSUSFV6G0NclebKDncP huGFofvx3BKPRmfzZp4iZx1wWQUxSHTmv6ceDwvP7P8GJ0mON+SrZxmmwUjKrf7V W9Sazl0p8e0nxSQykLyjjrkaBx5Iv+aUxu8Alomwy9BmpM8+gd2yutvzghW5L36L 0CvAtIMXdlc+eUdAqa/2rOk/nMOA9sfWVW0gkKYCZk6wvj2DMzjii05UechZ4Z+l 6nEU3UdVsbTX73CABZv4my4JAWc5Yk1s/cWrxtn68AfK8LMPFJCJcVXXOSckMWI= =351W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
