.. i'd rather you narrow down _why_ it's performing better before committing it.
Otherwise it may just creep up again after someone does another change in an unrelated part of the kernel. You're using instructions-retired; how about using l1/l2 cache loads, stores, etc? There's a lot more CPU counters available. You have a very cool problem to solve. If I could reproduce it locally I'd give you a hand. Thanks, -adrian _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
