On 01/23/13 14:27, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> > > both "works". For todays trend of solving everything by more hardware > ZFS may even have "enough" performance. > > But still it is dangerous for a reasons i explained, as well as it > promotes bad setups and layouts like making single filesystem out of > large amount of disks. This is bad for no matter what filesystem and > RAID setup you use, or even what OS. > > ZFS mirror performance is quite good (both random IO and sequential), and resilvers/scrubs are measured in an hour or less. You can always make pool out of these instead of RAIDZ if you can get away with less total available space.
I think RAIDZ vs Gmirror is a bad comparison, you can use a ZFS mirror with all the ZFS features, plus N-way (not sure if gmirror does this). Regarding single large filesystems, there is an old saying about not putting all your eggs into one basket, even if it's a great basket :) Matt _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
