On 15 November 2012 10:01, Attilio Rao <atti...@freebsd.org> wrote: > I think that your worries are focused more around the latter than the > former, which can be easilly shut down already today. > > And frankly I will never be in favor of a patch that automatically > shutdowns lock assertion. Please patch your local code to do so but > don't add any generic/upstream/all-around mechanism for that.
Would a comprimise be ok? Ie, if I pushed everything but the sysctl upstream, and just defaulted it to always panic? That way my diff wouldn't have to be a big thing; I'd just add the sysctl. adrian _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
