On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:54 AM, David O'Brien <obr...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 07:19:55AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> Hmmm... that's one of the 3 approaches I provided, but it turned out > ... >> 1. Test programs live with the sources (this was the requested approach), >> e.g. >> 2. Test programs live in subdirs: >> 3. Test programs completely decoupled from the source tree: > > Could someone please commit at least one working .c test and one .sh test? > > There is nothing to follow for others trying to write their own tests > in the FreeBSD-way. > > I could not find a single consumer of ATF in HEAD. This makes it seem > this is still a WIP that should be living in a branch and not in HEAD. > But we're paying the price for checkout & build times, etc... > See the recent 9.1-R thread and Peter Wemm (and others) comments in this > regard. > (this is why I hadn't committed the WIP I had - it wasn't ready for HEAD)
There are some basic examples, but they're in my p4 branch and unfortunately they depend on atf.test.mk/bsd.test.mk/bsd.progs.mk existing before they can be built (please see the Examples section in http://wiki.freebsd.org/TestingFreeBSD ). I also have the tests integrated in my perforce branch and running, but it doesn't do a bit of good unless the build pieces are in. I've been trying to get these things into HEAD in proper order so they can be used effectively. Thanks, -Garrett _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
