On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 03:00:21PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Here's an updated version of the workaround that works properly in all
> cases and installs bmake as make and links make to pmake when
> WITH_BMAKE=yes, and installs make as make when WITHOUT_BMAKE is
> specified (this works better than the previous patch I sent to Simon).

Garrett,
I don't see how this could be committed -- it will make it difficult
for 10-CURRENT folks to build ports (and there are no pre-build packages
for 10-CURRENT).

Are you not able to use this instead (w/"WANT_USRBIN_BMAKE=" in /etc/src.conf)?

Index: usr.bin/Makefile
===================================================================
--- usr.bin/Makefile    (revision 241927)
+++ usr.bin/Makefile    (working copy)
@@ -281,6 +281,9 @@ SUBDIR+=    msgs
 .if ${MK_BMAKE} != "no"
 SUBDIR+=       bmake
 .else
+.if defined(WANT_USRBIN_BMAKE)
+SUBDIR+=       bmake
+.endif
 SUBDIR+=       make
 .endif
 .endif

-- 
-- David  (obr...@freebsd.org)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to