On Oct 18, 2012, at 6:11 PM, Nikolay Denev <nde...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Oct 15, 2012, at 5:34 PM, Ivan Voras <ivo...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> On 15 October 2012 16:31, Nikolay Denev <nde...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Oct 15, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Ivan Voras <ivo...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/diffs/nfscache_lock.patch >>>> >>>> It should apply to HEAD without Rick's patches. >>>> >>>> It's a bit different approach than Rick's, breaking down locks even more. >>> >>> Applied and compiled OK, I will be able to test it tomorrow. >> >> Ok, thanks! >> >> The differences should be most visible in edge cases with a larger >> number of nfsd processes (16+) and many CPU cores. > > I'm now rebooting with your patch, and hopefully will have some results > tomorrow. > Here are the results from testing both patches : http://home.totalterror.net/freebsd/nfstest/results.html Both tests ran for about 14 hours ( a bit too much, but I wanted to compare different zfs recordsize settings ), and were done first after a fresh reboot. The only noticeable difference seems to be much more context switches with Ivan's patch. _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
