On 07/08/12 23:55, Doug Barton:
On 07/08/2012 07:41, Dan Lukes wrote:
...
Sorry, you're not understanding what is being proposed. Specifically
you're confusing the system stub resolver (the bit that's compiled into
libc, and used by binaries) and the resolving name server (BIND). No one
is proposing to replace the stub.
libc stub resolver is BIND code based, so I assumed that arguments
against BIND apply to it as well.
I'm happy it's not true.
In my humble opinion, no resolving name server need to be part of base
at all. We have no DHCP, VPN, RADIUS, WWW, ... server in the base as well.
Thank you for clarifying.
Dan
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
