On 07/07/2012 19:44, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>> <<On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 16:17:53 -0700, Doug Barton <[email protected]> said:
>>
>>> BIND in the base today comes with a full-featured local resolver
>>> configuration, which I'm confident that Dag-Erling can do for unbound
>>> (and which I would be glad to assist with if needed). Other than that,
>>> what integration are you concerned about?
>>
>> The utilities (specifically host(1) and dig(1)) are the only
>> user-visible interfaces I care about. I don't see any need for there
>> to be an authoritative name server in the base system. So long as the
>> resolver works properly and does DNSsec validation....
>
> The only reason I want it in the base system is that ports don't cross build
> very well, but the base system does. That's a weak +1 for keeping something
> in the base system, but I'll be the first to admit it is a second or third
> tier argument at best.
With the proper ports infrastructure, this issue goes away.
Meanwhile, we're already in basic agreement that importing unbound into
the base is a good stopgap.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
