Am 21.06.2012, 12:22 Uhr, schrieb Wojciech Puchar
<[email protected]>:
Lets make a summary.
What functionality would be good to have in FreeBSD that doesn't exist:
1) "runlevels" with arbitrary names. runlevel change would start and
stop right services.
2) exploit startup parallelism.
What we do not want to change:
- file structure which is simple. one file in rc.d/ per service and one
global config file (rc.conf)
- anything else that would make things more complicated.
As for
1) i propose in rc.conf an option to put "NO", "YES" (or ALL) or
runlevel list for each service or runlevel exclusion list for service.
examples:
service1_enable="YES"
service2_enable="NO"
service3_enable="foolevel maintenance"
service4_enable="YES -foolevel" (or ALL -funkyrunlevel)
name of default runlevel may be "full" or "multiuser"
service 1 will always work, service 2 never, service 3 only at runlevels
"foolevel" and "maintenance", service4 with any runlevel except
"foolevel".
still single rc.conf, not much bigger in practice.
2) no change in rc.d/* scripts and rc.conf, but change in scripts.
If everyone agree i think i may write this new scripts.
Nicely thought. Count me in for testing.
Do you think it would be possible to have something along the lines of
ifconfig_em0="inet ..." ( default (or unknown) runlevel )
ifconfig_em0_foolevel="inet ..." ( foolevel runlevel )
ifconfig_em0_maintenance="inet ..." ( maintanence runlevel )
too ?
Michael
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
