So let me know if you have any ideas for anything that would be
considered more than just a slight improvement, that would make you go
"OK, now it's seriously worth considering OpenRC as this is more than
just a nominal improvement in functionality."
actually i am happy with current system, but maybe others.
My most important ideas are:
- any new system should not be more complex
- ability to keep all flags and main config in single file (/etc/rc.conf)
must persist. I don't want mess. And for sure not only me.
- once again - the less files, the better.
Some time ago i had to use linux (fortunately no longer needed). As i
don't use it normally i just took debian installer that i remembered it
WAS usable.
After seeing the incredible complexity of /etc structure, not just rc
scripts, i deleted most of it and put startup sequence in single file.
It was plain horror.
If someone would like to make new ports subsystem from scratch then it would
be great. Would you like to ? ;)
I know you are joking, but in all seriousness, this is another area of
yes i am. but that joke is clear suggestion that we have already tens of
thousands better or worse made ports!
it's a good idea to stay in touch :)
if you have idea how to improve existing rc.d AND make ports working as is
then go on.
Anyway i don't see rc.d subsystem to be such a big deal that great
improvement are possible at all.
For me it is OK.
For a cases when i need really quick start or so - i just deleted it and
put everything in /etc/rc
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
