Hi Aleksandr! On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Aleksandr Rybalko <r...@ddteam.net> wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2012 09:05:47 -0700 > Garrett Cooper <yaneg...@gmail.com> wrote:
... > Hi Garret, > > I use it for embedded, kenv is good transport shared by loader, kernel > and userland (since there is no RW storages). Indeed. > IMO, kenv != sysctl, so we not need to match sysctl. But backwards > 'compatibility' is good reason to select second way. Which is what I figured; I favored the latter course at first and developed my patch based on that mindset, because I know people hate it when backwards compatibility is broken :) (in all fairness I'm generally one of them). Thanks! -Garrett _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
