on 05/05/2012 12:31 Andriy Gapon said the following: > on 04/05/2012 18:25 John Baldwin said the following: >> On Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:23:51 am Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> on 03/05/2012 18:02 Andriy Gapon said the following: >>>> >>>> Here's the latest version of the patches: >>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfsboot.patches.4.diff >>> >>> I've found a couple of problems in the previous version, so here's another >>> one: >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfsboot.patches.5.diff >>> The important change is in the first patch (__exec args). >> >> A few comments/suggestions on the args bits: > > John, > > these are excellent suggestions! Thank you!
The new patchset: http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/zfsboot.patches.7.diff > Some comments: > >> - Please move the type of the 'kargs' struct into the new header and >> give it a type name. Don't add the LOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT #ifdef's >> however or the new size field (see below). > > Done. I've named the header and the struct "bootargs". > >> - Add #ifndef LOCORE guards to the new header around the structure so >> it can be used in assembly as well as C. > > Done. I have had to go into a few btx makefiles and add a necessary include > path and -DLOCORE to make the header usable from asm. > >> - Move BI_SIZE and ARGOFF into the header as constants. > > Done. > >> - Add a CTASSERT() in loader/main.c that BI_SIZE == sizeof(struct bootinfo) > > I have added a definition of CTASSERT to boostrap.h as it was not available > for > sys/boot and there were two local definitions of the macro in individual > files. > > However the assertion would fail right now. > The backward-compatible value of BI_SIZE (72 == 0x48) covers only part of the > fields in struct bootinfo, those up to the following comment: > /* Items below only from advanced bootloader */ > > I am a little bit hesitant: should I increase BI_SIZE to cover the whole > struct > bootinfo or should I compare BI_SIZE to offsetof bi_kernend? > >> - Add a KA_SIZE for sizeof(struct kargs) with a CTASSERT. Use it in this >> instruction: > > Done. > >> + addl 0x1c(%esp),%ecx # Add size of variable args >> >> in place of the 0x1c > > Done. Plus some more. > >> - Don't add the new 'size' field to the end of the 'struct kargs'. Instead >> add a comment saying that if KARGS_FLAGS_EXT is set, then a structure will >> be present at (kargs + 1) that has a int size as its first member. > > Done. > >> Maybe >> create a 'struct kargs_ext' that looks like this: >> >> struct kargs_ext { >> uint32_t size; >> char data[0]; >> }; > > I've decided to skip on this. > >> - Use 'zargs = (struct zfs_boot_args)(kargs + 1)' in loader/main.c. >> - Change the ARGADJ line in btxcsu to be this: >> >> .set ARGADJ,0x1000 - ARGOFF > > I've decided to define ARGADJ in the new common header, then I've had to > rename > btxcsu.s to .S, so that the preprocessing is executed for it. > >> - If you are adventurous, you could even add a new constant ARGSPACE or some >> such with an appropriate comment in the new header that you use to replace >> the 0x1000 in btx.S and in the definition of ARGADJ. > > Done. > >> Hope that isn't too much, but I do think this will help make things even more >> understandable. >> > > I will send the new patch shortly. > -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
