On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:41 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 2:02:22 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > > on 17/04/2012 23:43 John Baldwin said the following: > > > On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 4:22:19 pm Andriy Gapon wrote: > > >> We already have a flag for ZFS (KARGS_FLAGS_ZFS, 0x4). So the new flag > > >> could be > > >> named something ZFS-specific (as silly as KARGS_FLAGS_ZFS2) or something > > >> more > > >> general such as KARGS_FLAGS_32_BYTES meaning that the total size of > > >> arguments > > >> area is 32 bytes (as opposed to 24 previously). > > > > > > Does KARGS_FLAGS_GUID work? > > > > > > > I think that's too terse, we already passed a pool guid via the existing > > argument space. So it should be something like KARGS_FLAGS_ZFS_FS_GUID or > > KARGS_FLAGS_ZFS_DS_GUID (DS - dataset). > > Ah. I do think the flag should indicate that the bootinfo structure is > larger, > I was assuming you were adding a new GUID field that didn't exist before. > I can't think of something better than KARGS_FLAGS_32. What might be nice > actually, is to add a new field to indicate the size of the argument area and > to set a flag to indicate that the size field is present (KARGS_FLAGS_SIZE)?
YES! A size field (preferably as the first field in the struct) along with a flag to indicate that it's a new-style boot info struct that starts with a size field, will allow future changes without a lot of drama. It can allow code that has to deal with the struct without interpretting it (such as trampoline code that has to copy it to a new stack or memory area as part of loading the kernel) to be immune to future changes. This probably isn't a big deal in the x86 world, but it can be important for embedded systems where a proprietary bootloader has to pass info to a proprietary board_init() type routine in the kernel using non-proprietary loader/trampoline code that's part of the base. We have a bit of a mess in this regard in the ARM world right now, and it would be a lot lessy messy if something like this had been in place. -- Ian _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
