Hi, On 22 March 2012 05:13, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> s/fixed/mostly worked around/ > > The problem is that the work around isn't perfect. The root cause is still > not fixed. avg@ has some ideas on better ways to handle this, but it is a bit > tricky to get this right since we also dont' want printfs to be delayed too > much (and to fix this perfectly requires buffering printf output). I'm rapidly liking the brokenness of the IO. Why? Because it becomes _very freaking obvious_ when things are running concurrently. I've found many ath/net80211 bugs because of this. Having it as an option would be nice. :-) Adrian _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
