28.01.2012 20:22, Attilio Rao пишет: > 2012/1/28 Ryan Stone <ryst...@gmail.com>: >> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Attilio Rao <atti...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> I think what you found out is very sensitive. >>> However, the patch is not correct as you cannot call >>> cpuset_setthread() with thread_lock held. >> >> Whoops! I actually discovered that for myself and had already fixed >> it, but apparently I included an old version of the patch in the >> email. >> >>> Hence this is my fix: >>> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/cpuset_root.patch >> >> Oh, I do like this better. I tried something similar myself but >> abandoned it because I misread how sched_affinity() was implemented by >> 4BSD(I had gotten the impression that once TSF_AFFINITY is set it >> could never be cleared). > > Do you have a pathological test-case for it? Are you going to test the patch?
I have the pathological test-case for it: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165444 Eugene Grosbein _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
