On 18 January 2012 13:11, Eitan Adler <li...@eitanadler.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Igor Mozolevsky <i...@hybrid-lab.co.uk> > wrote:
>> One way to >> "encourage" people to fix their code would be to prevent them from >> committing to -CURRENT once they pass a certain threshold of >> "unattended" patches. Of course then, committers will be whinging that >> they'd be resigning if they can't commit to -CURRENT, but quite >> frankly, why should anyone have the commit privilege if they can't be >> bothered to address the bugs, are those people just using the FreeBSD >> project to boost their CV (with great powers comes great >> responsibility!)? > > Wouldn't this discourage even more people from helping? Would this not separate people who have a genuine interest in contributing from "tinker-monkeys"? -- Igor M. :-) _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
