Possibly off topic, possibly not. Am I the only one who doesn't really care about uptimes? It would be far more productive to get a top 100 (or whatever) of availability... More interesting would be to test availability based on some dynamic content, a given request with an expected outcome a la F5? I may be forced to hack this together, where's my damn cable modem!!! Dave :) BTW, we didn't fare very well at all in the top *average* uptimes. Sun, OTOH, did. Bugger. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey Peter
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft surve... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft s... Anders Nordby
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcra... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft surve... Jamie Heckford
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft s... Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft s... Peter
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcra... Eric Melville
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcra... Frederik Meerwaldt
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in n... David Preece
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing ... Greg Black
- Re: FreeBSD in good stand... Wes Peters
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing ... Kris Kennaway
- Re: FreeBSD in good stand... Terry Lambert
- Re: FreeBSD in good stand... Michael C . Wu
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey Jonathan Perkin
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft surve... Laurence Berland
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey Joe Greco
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey Roger Marquis
- Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft surve... Alfred Perlstein