> > Time is SAME as with generic binaries, but score is just a 1.2 higher, > which is too small to be relevant. > > What do you think about this? > > > > I think this is why most people don't bother with setting CPUTYPE ;) > > Chris >
DUH! Why you didn't told me that right away. instead making me into "ALL THIS"! Yes, yes, very funy! I'll remember this! :P > As usual, it very well *may* be true, but please use ministat(1) to > confirm. This requires more than one test. I'm not trying to be > difficult - but statistics and benchmarking is non-trivial. > > -- > Eitan Adler I understand and have read your link about statistics and benchmarking ... Yes, I agree. It is science for itself. I've never heard for ministat(1) and will throw an eye on: > A few other good suggestions: > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/BenchmarkAdvice > > - Max > I would like to ask a few questions, regarding setting up ENVIROMENT for benchmarking, regardless of what will be benched! That is, point where benchmarking hasn't even started! I see it should be SUM (single user mode), with enabled, only essential "things" Should it be a regular or MD ROOT based SUM (FreeBSD running in RAM) Domagoj Smolčić _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
