Tim Kientzle wrote: > The current UFS code is designed to leave enough "slack space" to > support future file writes.
What if you turned the knob all the way down and had just one cylinder group? I assume that newfs would need to be fixed to allow this, but would anything break? The current limits are also wasteful for normal read/write filesystems with large files. Too many cylinder groups, too many inodes, block/frag size too small, etc... _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
