On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 19:47:57 +0300 Alexander Motin <m...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Comparing two ways implementing spindown, I've recalled that both of > them using xpt_polled_action() method, which depends on working > controller polling operation. So they could be almost equaly not good. > But the method present in HEAD now is more universal. Looking on fact > that need of spindown is not so obvious for SCSI devices (in SAN > environments), we can just make kern.cam.power_down tunable a bitmask > of supported protocols for now. Patch is attached. I've just committed the patch to move the functionality into ada(4). Should it be reverted? -- Bruce Cran _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
