on 19/09/2010 11:27 Jeff Roberson said the following: > I don't like this because even with very large buffers you can still have high > enough turnover to require per-cpu caching. Kip specifically added UMA > support > to address this issue in zfs. If you have allocations which don't require > per-cpu caching and are very large why even use UMA?
Good point. Right now I am running with 4 items/bucket limit for items larger than 32KB. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
