Since we have been using aegis for years and know it like the back of our hand I don't want to learn a new tool... but I think your right I am going to forward/cross post this entire thread to the aegis mailing list.
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 7:11 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Aryeh Friedman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I would prefer to have the plain text around after a power failure >> because it could be several days of work ... > > Ideally there should be _some_ mechanism for committing unfinished > work to a (probably encrypted) repository on, at least, a daily > basis. > > The more I see of this thread, the more it seems that the problem > is largely the fault of the particular VCS being used. A VCS that > demands a "review" step before anything can be checked in, even on a > "work in progress" branch as opposed to the mainline, seems a poor > fit for a project in which developers are not permitted to see one > anothers code. > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
