On Tue Aug 3 15:22:00 UTC 2010, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: ... >I therefore propose the following change to always link in >libssp_nonshared.a. I think this change is harmless when the symbol is >not needed in one of the objects linked together since the linker won't >pull in the library member "ssp-local.o" in the target object.
Will this do the right thing when the base system is built WITHOUT_SSP? How about the case of WITHOUT_DYNAMICROOT/NOSHARED/NO_SHARED=yes, with and without this change? Are changes to the specs of the lang/gcc* ports needed? What about clang? b. _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
