In message <199909160948.saa02...@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> Kazutaka
YOKOTA writes:
: case _PANIC_KEY_
: #if !defined(SC_DISABLE_REBOOT) && !defined(SC_DISABLE_PANIC)
: if (securelevel <= 0)
: panic();
: #endif
: break;
:
: Any opinions?
I can see this being useful only for systems that have a problem
coming up. Otherwise, adding options SC_DISABLE_{PANIC,REBOOT} would
accomplish this as well. So I'm mildly opposed to this since it hangs
yet another thing on securelevel...
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
