I filed a followup with a patch (against 4.x, but it will probably work just as well against 3.x, but I don't have a handy way to try it).
-Chris On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Mike Smith wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > > The aio_* stuff (I use a custom patched version in 4.x) offers > > > > performance > > > > advantages over select() with large numbers of descriptors. In terms of > > > > efficiency, I don't have any trouble saturating full-duplex 100mbit link > > > > with aio routines on a reasonably fast box (PII-400 512MB). > > > > > > > > As more work gets done to the aio stuff, there are some potential early > > > > advantages available to multiprocessor machines (since the program > > > > 'driving' the aio could run concurrently with the kernel code moving > > > > network or disk data). > > > > > > > > -Chris > > > > > > Do you by any change have an idea how to fix PR kern/13075 > > > (signal is not posted for async I/O on raw devices) > > > > Yes. There is no code to post the signal unless the job is of the lio > > variety. Writing a fix took about 15 minutes (including reboot). > > Extensive testing not included, though the test program provided with the > > PR now functions. > > You plan to file a followup to the PR, I hope. 8) > > -- > \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith > \\ of the man. \\ msm...@freebsd.org > \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msm...@cdrom.com > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
