> > > Yes, we shouldn't version bump every time someone has a whim, ending > > > up with 10 version bumps/week, but neither should we avoid them > > > altogether and cause the Linux syndrome of programs refusing to work > > > because they have the *wrong* version of glibc2.3 (or whatever).... > > > > This is starting to sound like what would help is tighter release > > management. If changes were held back long enough for a single version > > bump to cover multiple changes, the situation would be improved. > > I'm more tempted to revert to the major/minor versioning.
ELF has no minor revision number (IMO a mistake, but it's not my call). Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
