<<On Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:06:54 +0930, Greg Lehey <g...@lemis.com> said:
> Correct. I suppose it's worth discussing what the default should be. > Should they get EAGAIN or block? Obviously you'd want a way of > specifying which, but there would have to be a default for > non-lock-aware programs. I think I'd go for blocking; it's less error > prone. I'd be strongly opposed to any sort of mandatory locking. The whole notion is unspeakably evil, although this is mitigated somewhat if it does not apply to processes with appropriate privilege. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same woll...@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
