Narvi wrote: > > On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Mark Murray wrote: > > > > Couldn't you work the code so it obtains all its' encryption functions > > > from an external library, such as the system's libdes? That would let you > > > export the code, since it doesn't provide any encryption functions itself, > > > and international people could use the international DES library (for > > > other encryption algorithms, pick a freely available implmenetation such > > > as the one from openssl). > > > > This makes the most sense. Thrash it out as a port, and if that works, > > we can bring it into both repositories. > > > > Why not just wait and bring the openssl library in?
If it even talks to openssl, it's not exportable. > > A new telnet authentifications method that just we used is not terribly > usefull. A. It's not new. B. Not just we use it. It may not be tremendously widespread, but I assert that just as many people use SRA as use SRP or SSLtelnet (probably a lot more people use ssh).
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
