"Brian F. Feldman" <[email protected]> wrote: > >Is there anyone who is specifically checking for long long >C9X-compliancy in the source tree (mainly libc)?
I started reviewing libc for C9X features in general -- a fair amount of work is required to update macros and typedefs in <inttypes.h> (plus the new <stdint.h>). Doing a thorough job is difficult because C9X is somewhat gratuitously incompatible with gnu C (e.g. the spelling of __complex__, zero-length arrays in structures, macro varargs, etc.) and gnu C doesn't yet support restrict. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch [email protected] [email protected] e pluribus unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
