On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On 04-Aug-99 Matthew Dillon wrote: > > I kinda like the second choice the best but the first choice is what > > most > > other system calls use. > > That doesn't make it right =) > > The second avoids the 'the data is different but the size is the same' problem > which would seem to be not too uncommon..
If you are using the size for a version and you change the fields without ensuring the size changes, then you deserve all you get. In this kind of situation normally fields are simply appended to the structure. -- Doug Rabson Mail: d...@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
