I like the ability at secure level 3 to only reset the counters forward.. It fits in with such things as the "append only" flag.
Maybe a new keyword. "advance" julian On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > > > :That doesn't mean we shouldn't allow people to have an unsophisticated > > setup, > > :just because a sophisticated one is available. It would be useful to have > > :a per-firewall-rule counter, decrement it on each match if logging and > > :set, and be able to reset to something higher. > > : > > : Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ > > > > There may be some confusion here. I am advocating that we *allow* the > > zeroing of counters at secure level 3. > > Which is what I am advocating against. > > > > > -Matt > > Matthew Dillon > > <dil...@backplane.com> > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message > > > > Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ > gr...@freebsd.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \ > FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) | > http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/ > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
