On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:06:02 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%. Are you avoiding my question on purpose? :-) > On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 14:29:19 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > What does "sucking all the CPU time" mean? Does it mean that other > > programs were suffering, or does it mean that it was the only > > significant user of CPU and so showed up at close to 100% CPU usage? I don't care how the usage is split over syslog and inetd. What I want to know is whether their combined usage of the CPU causes a serious problem for other CPU-bound processes. After all, you _have_ asked the inetd+syslog pair to do a lot of work. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
