I am not sure I see a need for this syscall... julian
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Peter Jeremy wrote: > "John W. DeBoskey" <j...@unx.sas.com> wrote: > > I like this approach. I have a number of often spawned daemon > >processes that could benefit from this. > I don't suppose that you have any statistics showing that the > for (i = 3; i < getdtablesize(); i++) close(i); > approach would be too slow? > > > For naming convention considerations, I might suggest 'closeall' > >or 'closefdset' or something similar... at least have 'close' in > >name... :-) > > I'm not really keen on the name either - but I couldn't think of > anything better. `closeall' isn't really descriptive since it doesn't > close all the FDs. `closefdset' suggests (to me, anyway) the opposite > behaviour: ie closing the FDs specified in the passed fd_set, instead > of closing everything else. > > Peter > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
