On Sun 1999-06-27 (22:26), John Baldwin wrote: > > if people have their undies in a wad over this, can't they compile > > inetd without LIBWRAP? > > Ahem.. > > Let's say I have two services, foo and bar, with food and > bard. I want to wrap food, but *NOT* bard and they are both in > /etc/inetd.conf. How do you propose to solve this with the internal > wrapping (which is a good idea, IMO as it eliminates an exec())?
Run two copies of inetd? Seriously, if wrapping support can be tuned at runtime, and you can set up inetd to run with different configuration files (which you can), if those people who want to run both wrapped and non-wrapped services agree that this is an option, there needn't be a hack to do this sort of thing. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner n...@rucus.ru.ac.za To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
