> :Umm, okay.... but I'm a little confused about how the zfree I'm adding to
> :nfs_nget falls under this. Am I being really stupid here?
> 
>     it's unrelated.  I was starting a new thread.
> 
>     I have finished fixing up nfs_serv.c and am now testing it.  Most of
>     the procedures required significant adjustments to catch all the 
>     problems - mainly due to the various NFS macros in nfsm_subs.h doing
>     'goto nfsmout;'.

Way to go!  I was hoping this would happen... it is the miracle of Open Source.
I am a bit sad that I'm not doing any of the stuff now though :(, you guys
are just too gosh darn quick.

Seriously though... when are we likely to see this stuff hit -STABLE?  I would
like to to dig through your nfs_serv.c at some point before it gets commited
too.  There are a couple of other NFSv3 bugs that I have been tracking and I
would like to see if this addresses those.

--
David Cross                               | email: cro...@cs.rpi.edu 
Systems Administrator/Research Programmer | Web: http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~crossd 
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute,         | Ph: 518.276.2860            
Department of Computer Science            | Fax: 518.276.4033
I speak only for myself.                  | WinNT:Linux::Linux:FreeBSD


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to