> :Umm, okay.... but I'm a little confused about how the zfree I'm adding to > :nfs_nget falls under this. Am I being really stupid here? > > it's unrelated. I was starting a new thread. > > I have finished fixing up nfs_serv.c and am now testing it. Most of > the procedures required significant adjustments to catch all the > problems - mainly due to the various NFS macros in nfsm_subs.h doing > 'goto nfsmout;'.
Way to go! I was hoping this would happen... it is the miracle of Open Source. I am a bit sad that I'm not doing any of the stuff now though :(, you guys are just too gosh darn quick. Seriously though... when are we likely to see this stuff hit -STABLE? I would like to to dig through your nfs_serv.c at some point before it gets commited too. There are a couple of other NFSv3 bugs that I have been tracking and I would like to see if this addresses those. -- David Cross | email: cro...@cs.rpi.edu Systems Administrator/Research Programmer | Web: http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~crossd Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, | Ph: 518.276.2860 Department of Computer Science | Fax: 518.276.4033 I speak only for myself. | WinNT:Linux::Linux:FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message