I've edited the makefile in the portes, and the source, to install xcircuit 2.0a10 rather than 1.7 (1.7 can't open its own files, it seems).
the old patch-aa was *** Imakefile.orig Thu Mar 12 12:22:41 1998 --- Imakefile Sun May 17 15:52:05 1998 *************** *** 31,37 **** # Change the following as desired to suit your environment: #------------------------------------------------------------------------ # ! PREFIX = /usr/local XCIRCUIT_LIB_DIR = $(PREFIX)/lib/xcircuit XCIRCUIT_BIN_DIR = $(PREFIX)/bin XCIRCUIT_MAN_DIR = $(PREFIX)/man/man1 --- 31,37 ---- # Change the following as desired to suit your environment: #------------------------------------------------------------------------ # ! PREFIX ?= /usr/local XCIRCUIT_LIB_DIR = $(PREFIX)/lib/xcircuit XCIRCUIT_BIN_DIR = $(PREFIX)/bin XCIRCUIT_MAN_DIR = $(PREFIX)/man/man1 so I put the ? into that line in Imakefile. Of the second patchfile, the first patch was already in main, and the second added fpsetmask(0) conditionally for freebsd at the beginning of main, so I inserted this. It compiles & installs, then executes, quite nicely. I found instructions on what to do with them once I made them, but I'm not clear on how to make them. I need to make a patch against /usr/ports/cad/xcircuit/work/xcircuit-2.0a10/xcircuit.c, /usr/ports/cad/xcircuit/work/xcircuit-2.0a10/Imakefile, and the Makefile. I presume there's some difference between how I do the first two and the third. And then I expect that there's some kind of CVS meta-patch that gets created, cos that a cvsup will update folks port collection? rick -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
