> Dennis wrote:
> 
> > For "Fairness" gaps in between frames are better
> > as you approach capacity of your wire.
> 
> Isn't there some ethernet requirement (implemented on the NIC) that a
> transmitter holds off the wire a little to give other NICs enough time
> to notice there's nothing being transmitted?
> 
> The sequence of events would be something like:
> 
> NIC1                          NIC2                    time |
>                                                            v
> start xmit
> host queues next packet
> xmit finishes
> start "back-to-back" delay
>                               sense idle wire
>                               start xmit
> sense access from NIC2
> "back-to-back" delay ends
> wait for wire idle
>                               xmit finishes
> sense idle
> start xmit
> 
> 
No, only when there is a collision, both sides then wait a random amount
of time before trying again.

Marc.

----------------------------------------------------
Marc van Kempen                 BowTie Technology     
Email: m...@bowtie.nl            WWW & Databases
tel. +31 40 2 43 20 65         
fax. +31 40 2 44 21 86         http://www.bowtie.nl
----------------------------------------------------





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to