> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luigi Rizzo [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, May 31, 1999 12:39 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: a two-level port system? (fwd)
>
> in fact i think the biggest problem, performancewise, is the presence
> of multiple subdirs per port.
> I'd be happy if we could build a backward compatible method that (in
> order of importance)
>
[ML] [worthwile suggestions deleted]
> comments ?
[ML] This would offer an advantage over the existing system
only if all ports are updated to the new schema, which is a lot of work.
shar approach could be easily mechanised, and requires no changes in the
makefiles or the ports themselves. OTOH, shar offers no advantages to
the folks who build all ports (or most of them) because they end up
creating all directories anyway. I think Satoshi is the only such
person :)
/Marino
> luigi
> -----------------------------------+----------------------------------
> ---
> Luigi RIZZO, [email protected] . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione
> http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa
> TEL/FAX: +39-050-568.533/522 . via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA
> (Italy)
>
> http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ngc99/
> ==== First International Workshop on Networked Group Communication
> ====
> -----------------------------------+----------------------------------
> ---
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
